Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBroderick, Barry J
dc.contributor.authorBreathnach, Oisin
dc.contributor.authorCondon, Finbarr
dc.contributor.authorMasterson, Eric
dc.contributor.authorÓLaighin, Gearóid
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:01:41Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:01:41Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifier.citationBroderick, Barry J; Breathnach, Oisin; Condon, Finbarr; Masterson, Eric; ÓLaighin, Gearóid (2013). Haemodynamic performance of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (nmes) during recovery from total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 8 ,
dc.identifier.issn1749-799X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/10541
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients post total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain at high risk of developing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) during the recovery period following surgery despite the availability of effective pharmacological and mechanical prophylactic methods. The use of calf muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) during the hospitalised recovery period on this patient group may be effective at preventing DVT. However, the haemodynamic effectiveness and comfort characteristics of NMES in post-THA patients immediately following surgery have yet to be established. Methods: The popliteal veins of 11 patients, who had undergone unilateral total hip replacement surgery on the day previous to the study, were measured using Doppler ultrasound during a 4 hour neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) session of the calf muscles. The effect of calf muscle NMES on peak venous velocity, mean venous velocity and volume flow were compared to resting values. Comfort was assessed using a 100mm non-hatched visual analogue scale taken before application of NMES, once NMES was initiated and before NMES was withdrawn. Results: In the operated limb NMES produced increases in peak venous velocity of 99% compared to resting. Mean velocity increased by 178% compared to resting and volume flow increased by 159% compared to resting. In the un-operated limb, peak venous velocity increased by 288%, mean velocity increased by 354% and volume flow increased by 614% compared to basal flow (p<0.05 in all cases). There were no significant differences observed between the VAS scores taken before the application of NMES, once NMES was initiated and before NMES was withdrawn (p=.211). Conclusions: NMES produces a beneficial hemodynamic response in patients in the early post-operative period following orthopaedic surgery. This patient group found extended periods of calf-muscle NMES tolerable.
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
dc.subjectneuromuscular electrical stimulation
dc.subjectnmes
dc.subjectdeep vein thrombosis
dc.subjectdvt
dc.subjecttotal hip arthroplasty
dc.subjectlower limb hemodynamics
dc.subjectvenous-blood flow
dc.subjectknee arthroplasty
dc.subjectlower-limb
dc.subjectthromboembolism
dc.subjectcompression
dc.subjectprevention
dc.subjectdevice
dc.subjectmuscle
dc.subjectthromboprophylaxis
dc.subjectdisease
dc.titleHaemodynamic performance of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (nmes) during recovery from total hip arthroplasty
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1749-799x-8-3
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799x-8-3
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record