Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHull, Richard
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-18T14:35:58Z
dc.date.available2015-02-18T14:35:58Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/4875
dc.description.abstractThis thesis will propose that an innovative synthesis between 'ecosystem health' (EH) and the 'precautionary principle' (PP) can open up new and fruitful avenues for sustainability theory. My precautionary ecosystem health principle (PEHP) will be grounded on a weak anthropocentric approach, guided by contributory value, and will be promoted as a replacement to non-anthropocentric and intrinsic value definitions. My PEHP framework will propose an adaptive, resilient, and dynamic approach instead of relying on fixed ecological benchmarks. I will argue that health is a thick descriptor, but I will argue against it being defined intrinsically. I will establish that we receive many different benefits from ecosystems, such as ecosystem goods, services, and cultural services. I will claim that there are different ways to estimate the value we place on these ecosystem benefits without having to resort to economic pricing, such as non-excludable goods and services. Ecosystem services and cultural services must be taken into account, as they are fundamental for the functional capacity of ecosystems and can enrich our lives in non-material ways, recreational, spiritual, and psychological. I will propose that catastrophic and irreversible harm should not be used as thresholds to guide precautionary action, but a resilience approach will be more appropriate to guide the PEHP. I will propose that a post-normal scientific approach to decision-making is a more appropriate approach to take in the PEHP because it acknowledges both the scientist and public's opinions on risk instead of just focusing on one or the other, and allows us to evaluate the benefits of ecosystem and cultural services instead of simply overlooking them for economic benefits. Overall, my approach will contribute to the area of sustainability theory by offering a philosophical analysis of the PP and EH and by integrating them together within a holistic weak anthropocentric framework the PEHP.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental ethicsen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectWeak anthropocentrismen_US
dc.subjectPrecautionary principleen_US
dc.subjectEcosystem healthen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.titleThe precautionary ecosystem health principle: Weak anthropocentrism, environmental ethics, and sustainabilityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.funderNUI Galway PhD Scholarshipen_US
dc.local.noteThe main aim of this thesis is to evaluate some of the predominant issues within sustainability debates in order to find a suitable environmental framework to overcome many of these stagnating and confrontational issues. In order to find possible compromises or alternatives for many of the divergences and arguments within the environmental arena, I propose a merger between the precautionary principle and ecosystem health, in my original precautionary ecosystem health principle (PEHP). I believe it will overcome many of the issues and dichotomies within the debate and allows us new avenues within the sustainability debate.en_US
dc.local.finalYesen_US
nui.item.downloads712


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record